In database terms we need to implement this as READ UNCOMMITTED.
The data we are searching against is likely being changed by other
cache operations. It is a best efforts approach.
This should suit. Max?
On 14/11/2009, at 1:48 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Just to check, it would be important to implement something like
> this that you don't require a consistent snapshot of the answer but
> rather a best effort snapshot. That is, as you're taking the
> snapshot, things might be added/updated/removed behind you.
> Otherwise you essentially require a "lock the world" kind of
> concurrency which would be really slow.
>
Ford Ranchero Parts