-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: page 127 - possible mistake.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:57 pm 
Beginner
Beginner

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 20
"If you omit this information, the JPA provider defaults to the unqualified class name (just as Hibernate will if you omit the table name in an XML mapping file)."

instead of "... the JPA provider defaults ...", wouldnt it be "... the JPA provideS defaults ..." (this one can be the problem with my english, or maybe not, so i am pointing as a possible mistake too.)

and

instead of "... unqualified class name ...", wouldnt it be "... unqualified table name ..."

regards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:09 pm 
Hibernate Team
Hibernate Team

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:11 pm
Posts: 4592
Location: Switzerland
The text is correct.

_________________
JAVA PERSISTENCE WITH HIBERNATE
http://jpwh.org
Get the book, training, and consulting for your Hibernate team.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.