-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: is it must to have a seperate table for a map in a class??
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:44 pm 
Regular
Regular

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:50 am
Posts: 59
hi,

I have class A which has object of class B in it.
Class B just has a map.

I want to map above by using 2 tables. 1 for Class A and the other for map.
I want to skip table for B as it doesn't have any attributes other than map.
I have one-to-one mapping between A and B.

Kindly help with your knowledge on this.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.