-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Hibernate & Java Persistence » Hibernate Users

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 1
  [ 2 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
bora.erbas
 Post subject: Performance: Annotation based mapping VS XML based mapping
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:00 am 
Newbie

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:03 am
Posts: 8
Hi,

Does anybody have any experience as to which type of mapping results in what kinds of performance issues..?
Which is better in terms of speed? Or they are the same?
I have 200+ tables to map...
I can see the xml mapping has an overhead at startup...

Thanks.
Top
 Profile  
 
kochcp
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:54 am 
Expert
Expert

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:11 pm
Posts: 628
Location: Cincinnati
doesn't matter, all the mapping information must be read in by the Configuration class before SessionFactory instantiation anyways. It's more of a personal preference of where you want your mapping information to be.

_________________
Chris

If you were at work doing this voluntarily, imagine what you'd want to see to answer a question.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 1
  [ 2 posts ] 

Board index » Hibernate & Java Persistence » Hibernate Users

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.