Hi,

B extends A.
C has one-to-many assosiation to the B.

If I use joined-subclass for A and B then foreign key appears in the B's table. It's correct.

But if I use subclass and join (table per subclass with discriminator) then foreign key appears in the A's table.

The last one confuse me, because if I make many-to-one assosiation in B to the C (that makes assosiation bidirectional) the foreign key appears in the B's table.

Is it a bug or misuse?

Thanks