-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Hibernate & Java Persistence » Hibernate Users

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 1
  [ 2 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
tmakaro
 Post subject: optimistic locking using version seems dangerous
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:00 pm 
Newbie

Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:04 pm
Posts: 5
Hi, wouldn't it be better to use optimistic-lock="all" rather than "version"?

If someone modifies a row in a database using something other than hibernate and they don't update the version, how is hibernate to know?
Top
 Profile  
 
christian
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:03 pm 
Hibernate Team
Hibernate Team

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:11 pm
Posts: 4592
Location: Switzerland
Because "someone" might also use the version column to mark his changes or because you should use "all" if he doesn't do this. Version mappings are really useful if there is no "someone".

_________________
JAVA PERSISTENCE WITH HIBERNATE
http://jpwh.org
Get the book, training, and consulting for your Hibernate team.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 1
  [ 2 posts ] 

Board index » Hibernate & Java Persistence » Hibernate Users

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.