-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Is ...transaction.manager_lookup_class ALWAYS required?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 5:23 pm 
Newbie

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:53 pm
Posts: 14
Location: New Jersey
Does hibernate2.1rc1 ALWAYS require you to specify hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class when using JVM-level caching? Only in a JTA environment? Or even when using JDBC connections/transactions?

The on-line documentation (Section 3.5, Table 3.3) seems to indicate only when JVM-level caching is enabled in a JTA environment. But the Hibernate changelog says "ALWAYS" when using JCS caching, and that the JTA TransactionManager is now used even when not using Hibernate Transaction API.

If it is ALWAYS required, I assume it's not specific to JCS caching, but any JVM-level caching (regardless of which cache provider is being used).

Thanks for the clarification!

Sarah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 8:04 pm 
Hibernate Team
Hibernate Team

Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 12:50 pm
Posts: 5130
Location: Melbourne, Australia
You should always specify hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class when using JVM-level caching in a JTA environment. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.