-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Hibernate 2.1 beta 6 , is It time to change ?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:29 pm 
Beginner
Beginner

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 4:32 pm
Posts: 36
Location: S
Is it time to change from 2.0.3 to 2.1 beta 6 ?

I


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:34 pm 
Expert
Expert

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 4:06 pm
Posts: 318
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
Do not you think the word "beta" is the answer? :)

Nobody but YOU should decide if it is early or not. If you can't live without new features you just have no choice. Otherwise...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:38 pm 
Beginner
Beginner

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 4:32 pm
Posts: 36
Location: S
My question is :


Is Beta 6 almost 'stable' ?

[/b]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:40 pm 
Hibernate Team
Hibernate Team

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:11 pm
Posts: 4592
Location: Switzerland
A beta is by definition not stable.

_________________
JAVA PERSISTENCE WITH HIBERNATE
http://jpwh.org
Get the book, training, and consulting for your Hibernate team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:40 pm 
Hibernate Team
Hibernate Team

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:11 pm
Posts: 4592
Location: Switzerland
Hibernate usually is :)

_________________
JAVA PERSISTENCE WITH HIBERNATE
http://jpwh.org
Get the book, training, and consulting for your Hibernate team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Lazy question
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:46 pm 
Expert
Expert

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 4:06 pm
Posts: 318
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
This question is "lazy" in Gavin's terms because I did not search all the documentation, just checked it quickly :)

I have classes A and B.
A lives in TBL_A, B is in TBL_B.
B extends A and mapped using <joined-subclass>

As I see, when use I session.delete(objectB), this removes records from both tables.

The quesion is: my I control this behavior? I need to delete only "subclass" part of the class, leaving its "base" in the database.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:47 pm 
Expert
Expert

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 4:06 pm
Posts: 318
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
Oops, sorry. Wrong thread :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.