-->
These old forums are deprecated now and set to read-only. We are waiting for you on our new forums!
More modern, Discourse-based and with GitHub/Google/Twitter authentication built-in.

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Legacy database many-to-many mapping help
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:20 am 
Newbie

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:55 am
Posts: 1
Hi all,

I am having trouble mapping the following database structure (shortened for brevity with just PKs/FKs and a few extra columns:

Policy
---------------
Policy_Id (PK)
...

Risk
---------------
Risk_Id (PK)
...

Party
---------------
Party_Id (PK)
...

PartyRole
---------------
PartyRole_Id (PK)
Party_Id (FK not-null)
Policy_Id (FK)
Risk_Id (FK)
Party_Role_Type

So the PartyRole table can contain a row that links a party to a Policy and/or a row that links the same party to a Risk.
Basically it is a many to many join table but it combines both many to many relationships: Party<->Policy and one for Party<->Risk. Party_Role_Type can be either POLICY or PARTY and acts effectively as a discriminator to identify which relationship the row belongs to.

I've tried to model this structure with a 4 entities: Policy, Party, Risk, PartyRole. Here are the mappings:
Code:
<class name="com.blah.Party" table="Party">

    <id column="Party_Id" name="_id" type="int" unsaved-value="-1" access="field">
      <generator class="sequence">
        <param name="sequence">SQ_Party</param>
      </generator>
    </id>

    <bag name="_policyRoles" access="field" table="Party_Role">
      <key column="Policy_Id" />
      <one-to-many class="com.blah.PartyRole" />
    </bag>

    <bag name="_riskRoles" access="field" table="Party_Role">
      <key column="Risk_Id" />
      <one-to-many class="com.blah.PartyRole" />
    </bag>

  </class>

  <class name="com.blah.Risk" table="Risk">

    <id column="Risk_Id" name="_id" type="int" unsaved-value="-1" access="field">
      <generator class="sequence">
        <param name="sequence">SQ_Risk</param>
      </generator>
    </id>

    <bag name="_partyRoles" access="field">
      <key column="Risk_Id" />
      <one-to-many class="com.blah.PartyRole" />
    </bag>

  </class>

  <class name="com.blah.Policy" table="Policy">

    <id column="Policy_Id" name="_id" type="int" unsaved-value="-1" access="field">
      <generator class="sequence">
        <param name="sequence">SQ_Policy</param>
      </generator>
    </id>

    <bag name="_partyRoles" inverse="true" cascade="save-update" access="field" table="Party_Role" >
      <key column="Policy_Id" />
      <one-to-many class="au.com.cgu.harvest.domain.party.PartyRole" />
    </bag>

  </class>

<class name="au.com.cgu.harvest.domain.party.PartyRole" table="Party_Role" schema="Harvest">

    <id column="Party_Role_Id" name="_id" type="int" unsaved-value="-1" access="field">
      <generator class="sequence">
        <param name="sequence">Harvest.SQ_Party_Role</param>
      </generator>
    </id>

    <property name="partyRoleType" column="PARTY_ROLE_TYPE"
      type="java.lang.String" />

    <many-to-one name="_party" column="Party_Id" class="com.blah.Party" access="field" cascade="save-update" fetch="join" />

    <many-to-one name="_risk" column="Risk_Id" class="com.blah.Risk" access="field" />

    <many-to-one name="_policy" column="Policy_Id" class="com.blah.Policy" access="field" />

  </class>



All the java pojos are setup to match this mapping and all associations are setup correctly when objects added or deleted in collections. Policy is considered an aggregate root, so when it is saved by Hibernate I want to save the Parties associated with the Policy. When I add a Party to the Policy and Risk (and all the associated roles) I get the following exception:

Caused by: java.sql.BatchUpdateException: integrity constraint violation: foreign key no parent; FK_PARTY_ROLE_POLICY table: PARTY_ROLE

What is wrong? Also is this the best way to map this relationship? Is there a chance to map this relationship somehow _without_ the use of the intermediate entity? Thanks for all you help.

When


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
© Copyright 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved. JBoss and Hibernate are registered trademarks and servicemarks of Red Hat, Inc.